Quick Overview
- 5% of the Adobe RGB, and 95% of the DCI-P3 color spaces, while the PD2705Q covers 100% of the sRGB, 97% of the Adobe RGB, and 99% of the DCI-P3 color spaces.
- The PD2705Q, on the other hand, has a more traditional design, with a black bezel and a thicker profile.
- The PA278QV has a wider range of tilt and swivel adjustments, while the PD2705Q has a slightly taller height adjustment range.
In the realm of professional design, where accuracy and color fidelity are paramount, monitors play a crucial role. Two such monitors that have garnered significant attention are the ASUS ProArt PA278QV and the BenQ PD2705Q. In this comprehensive comparison, we pit these two titans against each other to determine which one emerges victorious in the battle for design monitor supremacy.
Panel and Display Quality
Both the PA278QV and PD2705Q boast 27-inch IPS panels with a resolution of 2560 x 1440. However, the PA278QV has a slightly higher pixel density of 109 pixels per inch (PPI) compared to the PD2705Q’s 108 PPI. This difference is negligible in most practical scenarios, but it may be noticeable to users who work with extremely high-resolution images.
In terms of color accuracy, both monitors excel. The PA278QV covers 100% of the sRGB, 99.5% of the Adobe RGB, and 95% of the DCI-P3 color spaces, while the PD2705Q covers 100% of the sRGB, 97% of the Adobe RGB, and 99% of the DCI-P3 color spaces. The PD2705Q has a slightly wider color gamut, but the PA278QV’s coverage is still exceptional for design work.
Design and Ergonomics
The PA278QV and PD2705Q adopt different design philosophies. The PA278QV has a sleek and minimalistic appearance, with a thin bezel and a silver-gray finish. The PD2705Q, on the other hand, has a more traditional design, with a black bezel and a thicker profile.
Both monitors offer excellent ergonomics. They can be tilted, swiveled, pivoted, and height-adjusted to ensure optimal viewing comfort. The PA278QV has a wider range of tilt and swivel adjustments, while the PD2705Q has a slightly taller height adjustment range.
Connectivity and Features
The PA278QV and PD2705Q come equipped with a comprehensive range of connectivity options. Both monitors feature HDMI 2.0, DisplayPort 1.2, and USB-C ports, allowing for versatile connectivity with various devices.
The PA278QV has an additional USB 3.0 hub with four downstream ports, while the PD2705Q has a built-in SD card reader. The PA278QV also supports daisy-chaining via DisplayPort, enabling users to connect multiple monitors with a single cable.
Calibration and Factory Settings
Both the PA278QV and PD2705Q come factory-calibrated to ensure accurate colors out of the box. The PA278QV has a more extensive calibration process, with a dedicated hardware calibrator that allows users to achieve optimal color accuracy.
The PD2705Q has a simpler calibration process, with a built-in software calibration tool. However, it does not provide the same level of precision as the PA278QV’s hardware calibrator.
Price and Value
The ASUS ProArt PA278QV is typically priced around $550, while the BenQ PD2705Q retails for around $450. Both monitors offer excellent value for money, but the PA278QV has a slight edge due to its more extensive calibration options and wider color gamut.
The Verdict
Choosing between the ASUS ProArt PA278QV and the BenQ PD2705Q depends on the specific requirements of the user. For designers who demand the highest level of color accuracy and calibration options, the PA278QV is the clear winner. However, for those who prioritize a wider color gamut and a more affordable price point, the PD2705Q is an excellent option.
Quick Answers to Your FAQs
1. Which monitor has a higher refresh rate?
Neither the PA278QV nor the PD2705Q has a high refresh rate. They are both designed for professional design work, which does not require fast refresh rates.
2. Do these monitors support HDR?
No, neither the PA278QV nor the PD2705Q supports HDR.
3. Which monitor has better software features?
The PA278QV has more advanced software features, including a dedicated hardware calibrator and a wider range of calibration options.
4. Is the PA278QV worth the extra cost over the PD2705Q?
If color accuracy and calibration options are paramount, then the PA278QV is worth the extra cost. However, for those who prioritize a wider color gamut and a more affordable price point, the PD2705Q is an excellent value.
5. Are these monitors suitable for gaming?
While these monitors are not specifically designed for gaming, they can be used for casual gaming due to their high resolution and color accuracy. However, their response times are relatively slow, which may not be suitable for competitive gaming.