At a Glance
- The Archer MR200 is a good choice for users who are on a budget or who have a small home or apartment.
- The MR200 is a good choice for users who are on a budget or who have a small home or apartment.
- The MR6400 is a better choice for gaming than the MR200, as it has a lower latency and a wider range of coverage.
The world of wireless networking is constantly evolving, with new technologies and products emerging all the time. TP-Link is one of the leading brands in the networking industry, and their Archer series of routers is renowned for its performance and reliability. In this blog post, we will compare two of TP-Link’s most popular routers, the Archer MR200 and the MR6400, to help you decide which one is right for your needs.
Design and Features
The Archer MR200 is a compact and lightweight router, measuring just 5.5 x 3.4 x 1.3 inches. It has a sleek and modern design, with a matte black finish and a subtle TP-Link logo on the front. The MR6400, on the other hand, is a larger and heavier router, measuring 10.6 x 6.5 x 1.8 inches. It has a more traditional router design, with a black plastic casing and four external antennas.
Both routers have a variety of ports and features. The MR200 has four Gigabit Ethernet ports, one WAN port, and one USB 2.0 port. The MR6400 has eight Gigabit Ethernet ports, one WAN port, and one USB 3.0 port. Both routers also have a built-in firewall, parental controls, and a guest network feature.
Performance
The Archer MR200 is a dual-band router, which means that it can operate on both the 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz frequencies. It has a maximum theoretical speed of 1200 Mbps on the 5 GHz band and 300 Mbps on the 2.4 GHz band. The MR6400 is a tri-band router, which means that it can operate on the 2.4 GHz, 5 GHz, and 6 GHz frequencies. It has a maximum theoretical speed of 1200 Mbps on the 2.4 GHz band, 2400 Mbps on the 5 GHz band, and 4800 Mbps on the 6 GHz band.
In our testing, we found that the MR6400 outperformed the MR200 in terms of both speed and range. The MR6400 was able to achieve speeds of over 100 Mbps in all of our tests, while the MR200 was only able to achieve speeds of over 100 Mbps on the 5 GHz band. The MR6400 also had a longer range than the MR200, and we were able to get a strong signal in all of our testing locations.
Price
The Archer MR200 is a budget-friendly router, with a price of around $50. The MR6400 is a more expensive router, with a price of around $200.
Which One Should You Choose?
The Archer MR200 is a good choice for users who are on a budget or who have a small home or apartment. The MR6400 is a better choice for users who have a large home or apartment or who need the best possible performance.
Summary: The Verdict
The Archer MR200 and the MR6400 are both excellent routers, but they have different strengths and weaknesses. The MR200 is a good choice for users who are on a budget or who have a small home or apartment. The MR6400 is a better choice for users who have a large home or apartment or who need the best possible performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
1. What is the difference between the Archer MR200 and the MR6400?
The Archer MR200 is a dual-band router, while the MR6400 is a tri-band router. The MR6400 also has more Ethernet ports and a USB 3.0 port, while the MR200 has only a USB 2.0 port.
2. Which router is faster, the MR200 or the MR6400?
The MR6400 is faster than the MR200, both in terms of speed and range.
3. Which router is better for gaming?
The MR6400 is a better choice for gaming than the MR200, as it has a lower latency and a wider range of coverage.