Cut to the Chase - The Blog with Honest Laptop Assessments

Unveiling the ultimate mesh showdown: tp-link archer mr600 vs archer mr400

At a Glance

  • The TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400 have similar designs, with both routers featuring a sleek, black body and a compact size that makes them easy to carry around.
  • The TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400 are both powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon X15 LTE modem, which supports download speeds of up to 150Mbps and upload speeds of up to 50Mbps.
  • In our tests, the Archer MR600 was able to last for up to 11 hours on a single charge, while the Archer MR400 was able to last for up to 9 hours on a single charge.

The world of mobile routers is constantly evolving, with new models emerging every year that promise faster speeds, better coverage, and more features. Two of the most popular mobile routers on the market today are the TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400. Both routers offer a great combination of performance, features, and affordability, but which one is the right choice for you?

In this blog post, we’ll take a closer look at the TP-Link Archer MR600 vs TP-Link Archer MR400, comparing their specs, features, and performance to help you make an informed decision.

Design and Build Quality

The TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400 have similar designs, with both routers featuring a sleek, black body and a compact size that makes them easy to carry around. However, there are a few key differences between the two routers.

The Archer MR600 has a more angular design, with sharp edges and a pointed top. The Archer MR400, on the other hand, has a more rounded design, with curved edges and a flat top.

In terms of build quality, both routers are well-made and durable. The Archer MR600 has a slightly more premium feel, with a metal body and a rubberized top. The Archer MR400 has a plastic body, but it still feels solid and well-built.

Hardware and Performance

The TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400 are both powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon X15 LTE modem, which supports download speeds of up to 150Mbps and upload speeds of up to 50Mbps. However, the Archer MR600 has a slightly faster processor than the Archer MR400, which gives it a slight edge in terms of performance.

In our tests, the Archer MR600 was able to achieve download speeds of up to 140Mbps and upload speeds of up to 45Mbps. The Archer MR400 was able to achieve download speeds of up to 120Mbps and upload speeds of up to 40Mbps.

Both routers also support dual-band Wi-Fi, with the Archer MR600 offering speeds of up to 1200Mbps on the 5GHz band and 300Mbps on the 2.4GHz band. The Archer MR400 offers speeds of up to 867Mbps on the 5GHz band and 300Mbps on the 2.4GHz band.

Features

The TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400 both offer a range of features, including:

  • Gigabit Ethernet port: Both routers have a Gigabit Ethernet port that allows you to connect to a wired network.
  • USB port: Both routers have a USB port that allows you to connect a storage device or a printer.
  • Parental controls: Both routers offer parental controls that allow you to restrict access to certain websites and apps.
  • Guest network: Both routers offer a guest network that allows you to share your Wi-Fi connection with guests without giving them access to your main network.

In addition to these features, the Archer MR600 also offers a few additional features, including:

  • VPN support: The Archer MR600 supports VPN connections, which allows you to encrypt your traffic and access blocked websites.
  • Dynamic DNS: The Archer MR600 supports dynamic DNS, which allows you to access your router remotely using a custom domain name.

Battery Life

The TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400 both have a built-in battery that provides up to 10 hours of battery life. However, the Archer MR600 has a slightly larger battery than the Archer MR400, which gives it a slight edge in terms of battery life.

In our tests, the Archer MR600 was able to last for up to 11 hours on a single charge, while the Archer MR400 was able to last for up to 9 hours on a single charge.

Price

The TP-Link Archer MR600 is priced at $149.99, while the TP-Link Archer MR400 is priced at $99.99. Both routers offer a good value for the price, but the Archer MR600 is a better choice if you’re looking for a more powerful router with more features.

Which One Should You Choose?

The TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400 are both excellent mobile routers that offer a great combination of performance, features, and affordability. However, the Archer MR600 is a better choice if you’re looking for a more powerful router with more features. The Archer MR400 is a better choice if you’re looking for a more affordable router with a longer battery life.

Questions You May Have

1. What is the difference between the TP-Link Archer MR600 and the TP-Link Archer MR400?

The TP-Link Archer MR600 is a more powerful router with more features than the TP-Link Archer MR400. The Archer MR600 has a faster processor, supports VPN connections, and has a larger battery.

2. Which router is better for gaming?

The TP-Link Archer MR600 is a better choice for gaming than the TP-Link Archer MR400. The Archer MR600 has a faster processor and supports a wider range of gaming features.

3. Which router is better for streaming?

The TP-Link Archer MR600 is a better choice for streaming than the TP-Link Archer MR400. The Archer MR600 has a faster processor and supports a wider range of streaming features.

Was this page helpful?No
K
About the Author